Editorial policy

Peptide Network publishes educational guides about peptides. This page explains how those guides are researched, what they will and will not say, and how mistakes are corrected.

Sources we rely on

Facts are checked against primary and official sources before publication: regulator pages and labels from the FDA, EMA and DailyMed, records in PubMed and PubMed Central, peer-reviewed journals, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List and established news outlets. Pages from sellers, clinics and vendors are never used as evidence. When an article lists its sources, they appear in a Sources block under the text.

Evidence levels

Every guide says what kind of evidence stands behind a claim: an approved label, controlled human trials, small or uncontrolled human reports, or only cell and animal studies. When the evidence is thin, we say so rather than fill the gap.

Doses and buying

Guides describe the amounts that published studies used and the doses stated on approved labels, with the label named. We do not give personal dosing advice, schedules or injection instructions for unapproved compounds, and we do not name, rank or link to sellers of research peptides. Buying guides explain regulation and risks; they do not help anyone buy.

Independence

There are no sponsored articles, paid placements or affiliate links on this site, and no company reviews or approves our text before publication.

Updates and corrections

Articles show the date they were published and, when the text changes, the date of the last update. If you find an error, contact us with the page address and what is wrong. Confirmed errors are corrected in the article and the update date changes.